Posts Tagged ‘Arab League’

Syria: Why “I told you so” is . . .

Posted on: May 27th, 2012 by Tom Pattillo No Comments

Children, dead. Families, dead. Citizens, dead. A nation, dying.

There was never any chance that the Syrian leaders would EVER adhere to a “peace”, “ceasefire”, or whatever mission. EVER.

On April 1st I asked in my blog: “Is there anyone left who still believes Syria will live up to its promises?”

And YET the insanity goes on.

The quoted attributed to Benjamin Franklin: “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”

How do those who “could” do something sit back and do nothing? Because, of course, doing nothing creates no change, no risk of being wrong, no missing the barbecue in the backyard in an hour.

“Make the universal, personal,” is my recommendation for all speakers.

The quote, attributed to Stalin, “One death is a tragedy, a millions deaths is a statistic” emphasizes the need to bring the blood, guts, smell, pain, and taste of war directly into the very rooms of the “leader’s” home. Not to purely or indeed primarily to shock, but rather to be a stimulus to action.

A short media clip. A holographic presentation. The family unit, past – living, present – dying, future – what future?

Seeing the present not as an “at a distance” representation, but an “in-your-face” reality.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

A closed mind, a mind steeped in the circularity of contempt for facts, a heart so inured to pain, it no longer feels anything.

Syria is falling apart. President Bashar al-Assad has reacted the only way he “could” based on his family, his religion, and his tribal heritage. He, and his beautiful wife, live inside the bubble of pleasure and peace. Their Syria is the Syria inside that bubble.

Orders to “protect” become orders to “massacre”, promises to “stop” become “lies” to gain time, Syria is my “country” becomes my country is where my “money” is.

AND YOU KNOW IT, AND I KNOW IT, AND THE GCC LEADERS KNOW (AND MOST HAVE PLANNED FOR) IT, AND THE UNITED NATIONS KNOWS IT . . .

“Knowledge is power” becomes “ignorance is blind”?

“Just because we choose to ignore the facts, does not make them go away.”

Everything I write seems so trite. Why should I care about the carnage taking place half a world away. Who gives a “proverbial” s _ _ _ ? Let the bullets pull bodies apart, spurting blood, silencing laughter, love, cuddles, and hugs. Why bother? Let the bombs, shells, rockets and mortars splay blood, guts, brains, lungs, legs, arms, eyes, hearts across the Syrian killing grounds. Why bother?

Maybe I am just not masculine enough. Maybe I have too much empathy. Maybe I care too much. “Really Tom” I hear my detractors saying, “children dying in Syria, what possible attachment do you have with them?”

Forget it. JUST FORGET IT.

Don’t want the facts? Don’t expose yourself to ANY media.

But, but, but, but, but – I can’t forget it. And if you can, well you haven’t read this far . . .

What’s next?

Killing young children cannot be an acceptable, truly human, answer. EVER.

What’s next?

Why do guns and bullets bring about insanity?

What’s next?

I want so much to believe in some sort of “higher” power, or “higher” goodness, that can “come down” and “make the world a better place”. Yet the only things I can imagine are the polar opposites of annihilation or “soma” (Brave New World).

How do “we”, homo sapiens sapiens, find and choose, a way of being that could be called  achieving full “homo sapiens sapiens” actualization.

(Self Actualization is the realization or fulfillment of one’s talents and potentialities, esp. considered as a drive or need present in everyone.)

Maybe there is no way.

Let them die.

or

What’s next?



 

 




Criticize the United Arab Emirates? Easy!

Posted on: November 27th, 2011 by Tom Pattillo No Comments

An unedited version of this response is at the bottom of this post.

Criticize the United Arab Emirates? Easy. Live there and the lack of logic, accountability and responsibility, cause both frustration and an unlimited source of humorous anecdotes.

The restrictions on Emirate women are to me unacceptable (four successful sisters and 3 successful daughters in Canada).  Why do the majority Emirati women appear to acquiesce?

CID (secret police) presence is overwhelming, yet non-invasive if on the right side of their laws. Police are professional and courteous. I thoroughly enjoyed teaching English language and communication programs with Police, Immigration and Customs officers. We shared meals, jokes, and laughter.

“Western” ex-pat professionals, experts, and consultants tend to accept that greed is a better motivator than “Western” truth, justice, ethics and morality.

“Non-Western” ex-pats are primarily laborers. To send upwards of 80% of their meager wages home to their families, they endure 10 to a room in a variety of conditions. Labor camps are “improving” because of international condemnation.

Non-Emirati Muslims (from Palestine, Jordan, Yemen, and Syria) cannot become UAE citizens. For some, going home is not possible. For others, the educational system and economic opportunities are better in the UAE than in their home countries.

When fired by a government organization (although lauded for my work and belief in the potential of Emirati Nationals), no reasons were given. The CEO was told to fire me. I had no recourse.

Where am I going with this? Simple explanations, simple understanding, simple conclusions, and simple criticisms are abhorrent to me.

The UAE’s 40th anniversary is next week. Consider Canada at 40 (1907); Could women vote? Were there controls on rapacious capitalists? Was there protection for the Chinese laborers that built our rail system?

Canada in 1967 versus the UAE in 1971. Only a 400-year-old Canadian would be able to witness the changes in Canada equivalent to the changes experienced by UAE in 40 years. From 1971 to 2011 the UAE has progressed from a desert and small business economy to what could be argued is the most technologically advanced country in the world.

Naïve criticism of cultural and religious influences on Emirati citizens is counter-productive to our “western aims and desires” for the citizens of the UAE.

We demand a more “western” orientation to women, power, business, democracy, justice, ethics and morality. We demand immediate changes. We demand they see the rightness of our demands. We demand and expect Emirati Nationals to easily accept these demands.

Asked about my five years in the UAE, I challenge my audiences to consider the different ethnic, racial, and religious influences on the Canadian mosaic.

Then I introduce four concepts that help explain the UAE (Arab) reality.

1) Tribes

2) Nomads

3) A “rentier” mentality.

4) The Muslim religion.

My Response to a reply to my “response” above.

Thank you for your comments.

I use the idea of a nation’s age to encourage perspective. There are people and cultures all over the world that practice behaviors based on traditions that we in the “West” consider barbaric.

Serbia, Rwanda, Cambodia, Russia, Germany, East Timor, India, China, Mexico . . . all have existed as countries well before the UAE was created. And their attacks on individuals, democracy, freedom, equality, peace are certainly not exclusively the result of the Muslim religion.

The common denominator in the worst examples of barbaric behaviors is authoritarianism, dictatorship, AND isolation from news about the world “outside”. Lack of education, social stratification, and the marginalization of women, also contribute to a country’s character.

Criticism of the Arab world, and the UAE in this comment, is based on the assumption that the UAE of 2011 is the same as “our” 2011. While the buildings, cars, airports, airlines, houses, highways, interchanges, malls, entertainment, and sports facilities are all equal to or better than many “western” oriented countries, the underlying, deep, traditional, cultural memory still drives the beliefs, attitudes, and actions of the majority of the Emirati National population. Culture, as anyone who has worked to change corporate culture, is notoriously difficult to influence let alone change.

It is absolutely imperative to know the cultural history of a society you are attempting to understand and potentially influence. Look at the UAE in 1971 or 1951 or 1931. Consider the native populations in those years. Consider their exposure to education, other religions, other nationalities, world media, different roles for men and women, childrearing . . . up to 1971. Throw in the negative impact of the “colonial” attitude on native populations and you will appreciate even more the reality of the UAE in 1971 to 2011.

Pictures of Dubai in the mid 1990’s show very little change from 1971. The major changes have been in the last 18 or so years. The Higher Colleges of Technology, the largest institution of higher learning in the UAE, was founded in 1988. Expansion to the smaller Emirates was not completed until 5 years ago.

The admonition “Ignorance of the law is no excuse”, does NOT apply. Ignorance pre-supposes awareness of “laws” and their application. Ignorance of what you should and can know is far different from what you are unable to know, and unable to understand. “We cannot perceive that which we cannot conceive.”

 Below is an unedited version of my first response.

It is easy to criticize the United Arab Emirates. When you live there, the little things that make no sense, the lack of logic, and the absence of the concept of responsibility, cause both frustration and an unlimited source of humorous anecdotes.

The role and apparent restrictions on Emirate women (though much, much less repressive than Saudi Arabia), were unacceptable from my perspective (four very successful sisters in Canada).  Why do the majority Emirati women appear to acquiesce?

The presence of the CID (secret police) is overwhelming and yet non-invasive if you are on the right side of their laws. For small accidents and some other administrative issues, as well as interacting with many as an English language / soft skills trainer, I could not meet a nicer group of people. We shared meals, jokes, and laugher. However they do of course have unquestionable authority.

On the other hand, “Western” ex-pat professionals have it made if they accept that greed is a better motivator than “Western” truth, justice, ethics and morality.

The “non-Westerner” ex-pats are primarily laborers who put up with “anything” in order to send upwards of 80% of their meager wages back home to their families. They live 10 to a room, or more, in a variety of conditions. Labor camps (hidden behind both the laws and the power of Emirati owners sponsoring the construction) are “improving” because of international condemnation. I met and worked with many, visited some of their accommodations and listened to their stories. I count more than a few as friends. Regardless of their lifestyle in the UAE, it is often immeasurably better that at “home.”

Are the labors slaves? NO. As per the Irish immigrants to the US in the mid 1800’s, slaves would be treated better because of their economic value (assets of their owners). The laborers, despite apparent reforms (stated but rarely implemented), are often treated as mere fodder for the economic prosperity. They can be, and are jailed for any verbalization or action against their working/living conditions. And they can be sent to jail and deported with no fanfare.

Non Emirati Muslims (from Palestine, Jordan, Yemen, and Syria) are not allowed to be citizens and are treated with destain. For some, going home is not possible. For others, the educational system and economic opportunities are better in the UAE than in their home countries. My “family” in the UAE are Muslim ex-pats from Jordan (to which they will eventually retire) and are wonderful, warm, and supportive friends.

I was fired from two government organizations (although lauded for my work and belief in the potential of Emirati Nationals). There was no recourse. None. Nor even reasons given for dismissal in one case. My CEO was told to fire me. End of story.

In another instance (completely unrelated to the above) I experienced the UAE legal system (I was sued, but won). It is a totally different process from Canada! I met, informally, a number of judges. The ones I met were not Emirati. Some from Saudi Arabia, some from Syria. They are intelligent and open to conversation and questions, but they are far more “powerful” than Canadian judges. You can appeal a decision, but rarely with success. The same judge, the same evidence; the same decision!

Where am I going with this? Simple explanations, simple understanding, simple conclusions, and simple criticisms are abhorrent to me. The UAE is 40 years old next week. Were we to look at Canada at 40 (1907); could women vote? Controls on capitalism? Protection for the laborers from China who build our rail system?

What is more important is to look at Canada in 1967 versus the UAE in 1971. The change in the UAE in those 40 years would be in many ways greater than that of our primarily European background from hundreds of years before 1867. Such change in 40 years is beyond comprehension by the average Canadian. A Canadian would have to be 400 years old to witness the changes experienced by UAE in 40 years. From the desert to the most technologically advanced country in the world in 40 years.

Pejorative accusations against the cultural and religious influences on Emirati citizens is both naive and counter-productive to the aims and desires of those of us in the West. We demand a more “western” orientation to women, power, democracy, justice, ethics and morality. We demand immediate changes. We see the rightness of our demands. We expect the Emirati Nationals to quite easily accept our judgements, our demands, and the logic of both.

When asked about my five years in the UAE, I immediately challenge my audiences to consider Canada’s cultural realities. The different ethnic, racial, and religious influences on the Canadian mosaic. Then I introduce four concepts that explain the current United Arab Emirates (Arab) actions.

1. A tribal history that dates back thousands of years and that continues to exist and significantly affect thinking and actions in all Arab based societies. (An interesting parallel to the Canada’s Aboriginal community.)

2. A nomadic way of living, again dating back thousands of years in the Arabian Peninsula. (And again the parallel to Canada’s aboriginal community.)

3. The “rentier” mentality brought on by the immediate and overwhelming influence of oil. The mega-prosperity experienced in the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain gave power to men (and only men) whose previous experience and history had been confined to a few thousand people, a small patch of desert, less than a little education, and leader status based on violence, blood shed, and death.

(While one could certainly argue that the Canadian Aboriginal Community is hardly rich, the same sense of entitlement pervades both the Arab and Aboriginal way of looking at their place in the world. For Canadian Aboriginals, the largess of the Canadian government could easily be seen to mimic oil revenue in the United Arab Emirates.)

4. The influence of the Muslim religion. Although most of the western media looks to the Muslim reality as the most significant influence on Arab actions, I would argue that it is the least important of the four. Easy to see, easy to attack, and yet of far less import. The tribal way of life explains suicide bombers far more accurately than the Muslim religion.

It will be interesting to observe the eventual outcome of the Arab Spring. I am not hopeful. The depth and pervasiveness of Arab culture is not to be overcome in a year, a decade, a generation, a century, or even a millennium. Yet we have to work with, live with, and grow with the Arab world. My simple advice is to begin with understanding. Only then can we accept the reality of Arab cultural assumptions. Only then can we find those areas of commonality upon which friendship and trust are based.




Time to grow up. Response to Syria ignores observer deadline – November 25, 2011, Khaleej Times

Posted on: November 25th, 2011 by Tom Pattillo No Comments
Syria ignores observer deadline
(AFP)

25 November 2011, 4:30 PM

DAMASCUS — An Arab League deadline for Damascus to accept observers or face sanctions passed Friday with no response from Syria, as activists reported more deaths and anti-regime protests inside the country.
THE FOLLOWING COMMENT WAS NOT PUBLISHEDThe Arab League’s actions will be watched closely by the international community.

Peace and stability in the region is necessary if only to keep Israel off balance (and to give the US more power to “influence” Israel).

Even one cruise missile within view of the Burg Khalifa will devastate all the economic progress in the Middle East.

It is not the International community’s responsibility to continually intervene in the Middle East.

The Middle East must take responsibility to maintain the peace.

An Israeli attack on Iran would be, in 2011, more the fault of the Arab League than any other party.

The Arab League is the body that can communicate with all parties.

The prosperous Arab League members have the military power to enforce their decisions.

It is time they use whatever means possible to defuse the situation.

They must control Iran, they must control Syria, they must step in to create effective government in Yemen, Libya, Egypt, and Syria.

The Arab League is playing with the big boys now.

It is time to step forward and take the actions required by the responsibility they seem to want.

If not, they will remain colonial states, bringing in “daddy” to solve their problems and look after their interests.

Time to grow up.